There was a traffic jam on Pittsburgh’s South Side this Sunday. This one was new and different. Between 1:00 and 2:00 pm I passed 227 people on the riverside trail. There were young, very young and not so young all jammed together. Most of them were on bikes and some were runners and skaters, elbowing their way through the crowd.
Three years ago I would have been lucky to pass fifty people on the trail.
Now bikes are everywhere, but not everywhere enough for us to rank as one of the top ten great biking cities. We should aim to be in that top ten. Cities that are bike friendly are cities where we want to be. Bike trails, bike lanes and friendly drivers are golden assets that bring new people and new life. Here, in Pittsburgh, we have all the pieces we need to get onto that list. There are three rivers, six river fronts and miles of trail connected to distinctive and authentic neighborhoods. We already have what many cities are now struggling to create.
My favorite list of the top ten bicycle cities is Wired Magazine’s. It wanders all over the world. Beginning with Amsterdam it ends in Basel, passing through a host of great cities in between. Four US cities make that list: Portland, Boulder, Davis and San Francisco.
National Geographic lists their top five as Portland, Davis, Tucson, Madison and Boulder. The Washington Post likes Portland, Seattle, San Francisco, Davis, Tucson, Madison, Chicago, Austin and Philadelphia. Some cities are repeats. Some are on everyone’s list. Pittsburgh is on none.
A study is in order. Someone needs to send me to study these cities. I’ll figure out what makes them great. I’ll put a plan in place to inch Pittsburgh up that list. And I’ll try not to have too much fun doing it. This is serious work.
So, Mr. Mayor and Mr. County Executive, get rid of those gaps in the trails. Finish those last connections. Get those shared lanes painted. This is economic development at its best. Quick, inexpensive with the potential for extraordinary results.